Methodology

How Linksmith reads a golf course.

Linksmith is independent course intelligence. Every figure on the site is computed from public data with a fixed method, so you can trust it and check it. Here is exactly how, metric by metric.

Courses190
With hole maps152
With walkability152
Data sources4
01Independence

The site cannot be bought into.

No paid placements

We don’t sell tee times, take placement fees, or accept payment to move a course up a list. There is nothing to buy.

Open inputs

Everything starts from public data: scorecards, OpenStreetMap geometry, satellite imagery, and weather forecasts. No private feeds, no black boxes.

Reproducible

The same inputs always produce the same numbers. When a ranking moves, it’s because the data moved: the weather, a corrected scorecard, new geometry.

02Data sources

Four public inputs. Nothing private.

Course scorecards

Par, yardage, course & slope rating, and stroke index for every tee set.

Per-tee, per-hole

OpenStreetMap

Hole routings, greens, fairways, bunkers, and water hazards, via the Overpass API.

152 courses mapped

Esri World Imagery

The satellite basemap the routings and hazards are plotted over.

≤ 1 m / pixel

Open-Meteo

A 7-day forecast (wind, precipitation, temperature) plus ground elevation.

Refreshed each visit
03How each metric is computed

Every number, derived in the open.

01

Linksmith Test

A 0–100 read on how demanding a course plays: a single composite of its difficulty.

Test = 0.45 × slope + 0.30 × scratch difficulty (course rating − par) + 0.25 × hazard density, each normalized 0–100

It measures difficulty, not quality. A hard course is not a “better” course, and this is not a “best courses” ranking. Courses without mapped hazards score that 25% neutrally, never a false zero.

02

Tee fit

Which tees you should actually play here, since most golfers play too far back.

driver carry → target yardage (USGA/PGA “Tee It Forward”) → nearest tee

Guidance, not gospel. If you don’t know your carry we estimate it from your handicap, and when two tees fit within ~120 yards we tell you it’s a judgment call.

03

Expected score

A realistic score for your handicap from a given tee, on a neutral day.

expected = course rating + handicap index × (slope ÷ 113)

This is the World Handicap System math: a neutral-day baseline. Wind and your own day do the rest.

04

Walkability

How hard the course is to walk, not just its length.

OSM hole geometry + ground elevation → total climb (ft) + routing distance (mi) → rating

Only computed for courses with full hole geometry. Cart-path routing isn’t modeled, so treat it as the walk a fit golfer would feel.

05

Per-hole wind

Which holes play into, downwind, or across today’s wind.

tee→green bearing vs. forecast wind-from: ≤ 45° into · ≥ 135° downwind · else cross (course flagged windy at ≥ 8 mph)

Uses the dominant daily wind direction; gusts, swirl, and tree lines vary hole to hole.

06

Hazard maps

Where the sand and water actually are, counted and located on the map.

OpenStreetMap bunker & water polygons → plotted on the satellite map, counted per hole

Only as complete as OpenStreetMap is for that course. A sparse map means sparse data, not a hazard-free course.

07

Weekend playability

A 0–100 score for how good a day is to actually play.

score = 0.5 × wind + 0.3 × precipitation + 0.2 × temperature (calm · dry · 60–80°F = 100; the weekend score is the better of Sat/Sun)

Wind dominates because it’s what wrecks a round. It’s a forecast, so it moves as the forecast moves.

04Limitations

What we don’t claim.

Credibility means saying where the data stops. These are the honest edges of what Linksmith knows today.

Methodology v1 · Myrtle Beach · reviewed May 2026 · built on open data, never paid placements.

Methodology: How Linksmith Reads a Course | Linksmith